Adherence, Awareness, Access, and Use of Standard Diagnosis and Treatment Guideline for Malaria Case Management among Healthcare Workers in Meatu, Tanzania
Background. Effective case management is a vital component of malaria control and elimination strategies. However, the level of adherence to the malaria diagnostic test and treatment guideline is not known, particularly at Meatu district. Therefore, this study aimed at determining the adherence, awareness, access, and use of standard diagnosis and treatment guidelines among healthcare workers in Meatu district. Method. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study, which enrolled a total of 196 healthcare workers in Meatu district. Healthcare workers were sampled purposively to reach the required sample size. A structured questionnaire was used for data collection. Results. Generally, 189 (96.4%) were aware of malaria treatment guidelines, while 148 (75.5%) had access and 98 (50.0%) used malaria treatment guidelines. One hundred and seven (54.6%) of all the healthcare workers adhered strictly to the diagnosis and national treatment guidelines. Ten (5.1%) partially adhered to the guideline when choosing antimalarials without confirmed malaria cases. Nonadherence to the prescription of recommended antimalarial drugs and laboratory confirmation was 79 (40.3%). Conclusion. Half of healthcare worker’s adhere to malaria diagnostic test and treatment guidelines. Most the healthcare workers are aware of the malaria diagnostic test and treatment guidelines. Continued education and assessment of the personal attitudes towards malaria diagnostic test and treatment guidelines are recommended.
1. Introduction
Since 2010, the burden of malaria morbidity and mortality has been declined substantially in different parts of sub-Saharan Africa [1–5], which has been due to larger-scale control intervention programs and improved case management. In spite of malaria decline and technological advances in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment, malaria is still one of the global health problems.
Effective case management is a vital component of malaria control and elimination strategies [6]. All patients with suspected malaria should be treated based on accurate clinical assessment, confirming the diagnosis by microscopy or malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) by testing blood samples before treatment with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) [6]. In some parts of Tanzania, clinical diagnosis of fever is widely used by healthcare providers [7, 8]; however, there is development and spread of antimalarial drug resistance [9, 10], that may have resulted due to poor adherence to standard diagnosis and treatment guidelines [11].
Studies on adherence to malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Tanzania are limited [12]; however, one study reported on adherence to artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) that relied on self-report [13]. The major challenge to the implementation of adherence to malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines has been documented to be slow in giving back information on the new drug regime at health facilities [14], and this points to lack of awareness on the availability of diagnosis and treatment guidelines.
Despite reports of malaria decline in different parts of sub-Saharan Africa, reports indicate varying level of adherence to malaria diagnosis test and treatment guidelines [15–17], as well as lack of awareness on the availability of malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines [16]. Furthermore, in many settings, national programs have devoted much in making sure that RDT is available in peripherals, and compliance to negative results will need to improve to prevent mismanagement of patients and overprescribing of anti-malarial drugs[18].
Tanzania Mainland’s National Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria was introduced in 2006 [19] and revised in 2014. The guideline stipulated artemether-lumefantrine (AL) as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in both adults and children, with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA PPQ) as a second-line treatment in cases of treatment failure [20]. Priorities for malaria case management are as follows: (1) to improve the quality of diagnostic and case management services, and (2) to maintain and improve supplies of the antimalarial drugs such as ACT in both the public and private sectors [21].
Therefore, this study was designed to determine adherence, awareness, access, and use of standard diagnosis and treatment guidelines among HCWs in Meatu district.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Area
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted from March to June 2017. The study was conducted at Meatu district. Meatu district is located in Simiyu Region, Tanzania. Meatu district is located between longitudes 34°8′ and 34.49″E and between latitudes 2°57′ and 4.9″S [22]. The region has a malaria prevalence of 13.4% among children and a fever prevalence of 21.4% [23], of which could be misdiagnosed as malaria cases. Meatu district has a total population of 299,619 people [24]. Meatu district has one district hospital, two health centers, and 45 dispensaries. The district has a total of 262 HCWs in general.
2.2. Study Population and Sampling Technique
The study included HCWs who manage malaria patients or capable of diagnosing and prescribing antimalarial medication in the district hospital, health center, and dispensaries. The study excluded all medical students who were interns. Purposively, a sampling technique was applied to select the HCWs who were ready to share their information.
2.3. Data Collection2.3.1. Questionnaire
Pretested semistructured questionnaires were administered to obtain information on HCWs socio-demographic characteristics, adherence awareness, accessibility, and usage of standard malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines. The questionnaire was divided into three sections as follows. Section one: this part investigated the general information of the HCWs including social-demographic characteristics such as age, sex, and experience at work. Section two: this part addressed awareness of standard diagnosis and malaria treatment guidelines. Section three: This part focused on adherence to malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines among healthcare providers.
2.3.2. Pretesting of Questionnaire
To maximize validity, the questionnaire was pretested on relevant respondents before distribution. Ten HCWs filled the questionnaire as a pilot study, and in-depth cognitive interviews were carried out to examine how the HCWs understood and responded to the questions. Besides, two experts in the field of survey design approved the quality of the questionnaire. After the pretest, adjustments in phrasings were made, and an additional question was included. Nevertheless, the data of HCWs involved in the pretesting of the questionnaire were not included in the final analysis.
2.4. Definition
Adherence was categorized as strict, partial, and nonadherence [16]. Strict adherence was when the choice of antimalarial drug for the treatment of parasitologically confirmed malaria cases was restricted to the national guideline for malaria treatment. Partial adherence was when there was no parasitological confirmation of cases, but the choice of antimalarials matched the national guideline for malaria treatment. Nonadherence was when there was no parasitological confirmation of cases, and the choice of antimalarial medicines did not follow the national malaria treatment guidelines [16].
2.5. Data Analysis
Data were analyzed by using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to summarise frequencies, proportions, percentages, means and standard deviations, tables, and charts. Percentages and frequencies were used for categorical variables, and means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables. Association between the awareness, access, and use of guidelines and type of facility were tested using chi-square and Fisher’s tests, and results were considered significant at .
2.6. Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
The approval was granted from Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College Research Ethics Review Committee. Permission to conduct the study was gained from the Simiyu district medical officer. Written informed consent was obtained from all HCWs who voluntarily agreed to take part in this study.
3. Results
3.1. Demographic Characteristics of the Study HCWs
A total of 196 HCWs were included in the study with a mean age (mean ± SD) of 35.09 ± 8.65. Most of the HCWs 84 (42.9%) were aged 21 to 30 years, and half of them were male 107 (54.6%). Lastly, 58 (29.6%) of HCWs were enrolled nurses. The demographic characteristics of the studied population are summarized in Table 1.
VariablesFrequency (n)Percent (%)Age in years21–308442.931–406131.141–503919.951–60126.1SexMale10754.6Female8945.4Type of health facilityDistrict hospital10252Health center3618.4Dispensary5829.6CadreMedical doctor31.5Assistant medical officer94.6Clinical officer4221.4Assistant clinical officer126.1Assistant nurse officer2512.8Medical attendants4724Enrolled nurse5829.6Work experience<5 years7236.75–15 years8040.8>15 years4422.4Table 1https://static-01.hindawi.com/next_assets/HnmUsY0sB9FR4pSI5DJoA/_next/st...) center center no-repeat; padding: 15px 0px 17px; min-width: 60px; max-width: 60px;" title="full view" href="https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jtm/2020/1918583/tab1/" target="_blank"> Demographic characteristics of the participants N = 196.3.2. Awareness, Accessibility, and Use of National Malaria Treatment Guideline
Generally, 189 (96.4%) were aware of malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines; additionally, of the 196 HCWs in the district hospital, health centre, and dispensary, 99 (99.0%), 37 (100%), and 53 (89.8%), respectively, were aware of malaria treatment guidelines (Fischer’s exact test = 8.2, ). One hundred and forty eight (75.5%) had access to malaria treatment guidelines while 96 (96.0%), 35 (94.6%), and 17 (28.8%) from district hospital, health centre, and dispensary had access to malaria treatment guidelines, respectively (Fischer’s Exact test = 95.58, ). And lastly, 98 (50.0%) usually use malaria treatment guidelines, accounting for 59 (59.0%), 24 (64.9%), and 15 (25.4%) from district hospital, health centre, and dispensary using malaria treatment guidelines, respectively (χ2 = 20.76, ) (Figure 1).
The majority of HCWs 145 (74.0%) were trained about malaria diagnosis and treatment at medical college. Half of HCWs 101 (51.5%) attended the training of malaria diagnosis and treatment. Most of study HCWs 189 (96.4%) has heard about national malaria treatment guidelines (see Table 2).
Variablesn%Training of malaria diagnosis and treatment At work5126.0 College14574.0Attended regular on-job training concerning diagnosis and treatment of malaria No9548.5 Yes10151.5Ever heard about national malaria treatment guidelines No73.6 Yes18996.4Table 2https://static-01.hindawi.com/next_assets/HnmUsY0sB9FR4pSI5DJoA/_next/st...) center center no-repeat; padding: 15px 0px 17px; min-width: 60px; max-width: 60px;" title="full view" href="https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jtm/2020/1918583/tab2/" target="_blank"> Awareness of national malaria treatment guidelines.3.3. Adherence to Malaria Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines
Table 3 summarizes the adherence to malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines. Generally, 107 (54.6%) of all the HCWs adhered strictly to the diagnosis and treatment guideline, in the confirmed malaria cases, accounting for 55 (51.4%), 19 (17.8%), and 33 (30.8%) in the district hospital, health centre, and dispensary, respectively. Ten (5.1%) partially adhered to the guideline when choosing antimalarials without confirmed malaria cases. Lastly, nonadherence to the prescription of recommended antimalarial drugs and laboratory confirmation was 79 (40.3%), accounting for 43 (54.4%), 15 (19.0%), and 21 (26.6%) in the district hospital, health centre and dispensary, respectively (χ2 = 4.45, ).
AdherenceDistrict hospitalHealth centerDispensaryTotalStrictly55 (51.4)19 (17.8)33 (30.8)107 (54.6)Partially2 (20.0)3 (30.0)5 (50.0)10 (5.1)Nonadhered43 (54.4)15 (19.0)21 (26.6)79 (40.3)Table 3https://static-01.hindawi.com/next_assets/HnmUsY0sB9FR4pSI5DJoA/_next/st...) center center no-repeat; padding: 15px 0px 17px; min-width: 60px; max-width: 60px;" title="full view" href="https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jtm/2020/1918583/tab3/" target="_blank"> Adherence to malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines (N = 196 if no other indication is present).
4. Discussion
Malaria continues to be one of the most devastating infectious diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. Interventions to control malaria require an integrated approach including vector control using long-lasting insecticidal nets, indoor residue sprays, provision of prompt and effective diagnosis, and treatment with effective antimalarial agents [6, 25, 26]. For this study, adherence to malaria diagnosis and treatment was measured in terms of parasitological diagnosis of malaria and treatment with the correct drug. Nonadherent treatment was defined in terms of inconsistency in the confirmatory diagnosis of malaria, prescribing of drugs other than antimalarials, and prescribing antimalarials to cases testing negative.