Effectiveness of Fiberoptic Phototherapy Comparedto Conventional Phototherapy in TreatingHyperbilirubinemia Amongst Term Neonates: aRandomized Control Trial
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
line-height:107%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
Background
Neonatal jaundice is one of the most common problems in new borns. Effective treatment of jaundice requires therapeutic intervention with phototherapy (PT). Conventional phototherapy has been used for more than 50 years, but has been linked with adverse outcomes. Over recent years, several studies suggest fiberoptic phototherapy has been seen to be as effective as conventional phototherapy in preterm new borns with minimal adverse outcomes, however it was found to be less effective than conventional phototherapy in term neonates.